Interest targeting isn’t dead in 2025 - but it plays a different role under Meta’s Andromeda delivery system. This article explains how Meta views interests today, when they outperform broad, and the practical framework modern advertisers use to combine Broad, Interests, and Lookalikes into a consistent audience strategy.

If you’ve been running Meta ads for the past few years, you’ve probably heard a version of:
“Interests are dead. Just go Broad.”
It’s a clean, simple slogan, but it’s not accurate.
In 2025, interest targeting still works, still matters, and depending on the account, can dramatically outperform Broad.
The real story is that Meta changed how interests fit into the delivery system, not whether they work.
Here’s the clear, un-biased breakdown.
Meta’s most recent guidance (shared widely during 2024–2025 agency briefings) is:
In Meta’s own words, interests are part of a “portfolio approach” - not a relic of the past.
So no, they’re not dead.
They’re contextual.
There were three reasons interests performed poorly for many advertisers a few years ago:
Many legacy interest categories were merged, shrunk, or deprioritized.
Massive improvements to machine learning made Broad a safer choice for mid-spend advertisers.
Attribution made interest-level insights harder to interpret.
These factors created the illusion that interests didn’t work anymore.
But with Andromeda’s rollout, interest targeting found its footing again.
Under the Andromeda delivery system:
Interests give the algorithm a “starting zone,” which can help new accounts or new creatives.
Broad delivery can swing heavily during scale-up.
Interests give you something to “anchor” to.
This is especially true for niche products, communities, or lifestyle-based buying patterns.
A major theme of 2025 Meta strategy.
The short version:
Interests are now a stability tool and a diversification tool, not a precision tool.
There are consistent patterns where interests win:
Hobby, niche, or lifestyle-driven products often overperform on aligned interests.
Interests help the system find early buyers faster.
During scaling, Broad sometimes shifts into CPM-heavy zones.
Interests can pull you out.
More constrained targeting means less noise in early signals.
Broad is better when:
Broad thrives when the system already understands your buyer.
Here’s the modern structure advertisers use:
The best-performing structure in 2025:
Avoid “interest soups” (10–20 stacked interests).
They perform neither like Broad nor like real targeting.
When people declare interests “dead,” they’re usually looking at:
In reality, interests aren’t weak - the testing structure is.
Meta simply changed the game.
Interests are no longer precision targeting.
They’re portfolio diversification.
In 2025, interest targeting still matters, but in a modern role:
The advertisers who win today don’t ask “Is interest targeting dead?”
They ask:
“Where does interest targeting fit in my portfolio?”
And that’s the real answer Meta would give you too.